is curious as cyclists, as a majority, do without the use of biomechanics when apparently do not perceive health problems, but otherwise yes rely on biomechanical adjustments to solve problems.
Common sense anyone practicing cycling should adjust your bike to your needs before discomfort to avoid possible injury that may arise with the practice from a position not suitable or use of components that do not correspond to the anthropometric measurements of the person specifically or the possible incursion of the two sides at once in the incidence of problems.
When we see a group of cyclists, if we observe, is very likely to find positions that are causing a disturbance. With this we are doomed to be revealed before or after the problem.
We have to warn you to be comfortable is not going in the correct position, and that comfort is the adaptation by a continuing sense in which the body gets used and assumed to be a comfortable situation that does not mean it is appropriate which over time can cause changes. comfortable situation is not right situation.
I would like to know your opinion on why cyclists ignored the use of biomechanics and prevention technique, efficiency and ergonomics. Is it due to lack of information, poor experiences with biomechanics, or simply an economic issue?
0 comments:
Post a Comment